Profile image
19
3
Story Views

Now:9
Last Hour:137
Last 24 Hours:2,524
Total:12,338

100 Million Years Old Giant Skull And Teeth Found Embedded In Coal

Sunday, February 24, 2013 21:51
% of readers think this story is Fact. Add your two cents.
0

(Before It's News)

Headline

 

>> The Mystery Powers Of Thoughts 

>> Shocking Longevity Miracle: 250 Years Old Yogi From India

>> Supernatural Powers Of Gigong Masters

>> Shocking Discovery: Noah’s Ark Found!

>> Buzz Aldrin Talks About Alien Building On Mars Moon

 

Wrote Bill O'Brien:   

"There was a time when Conrad regarded the integrity of the scientific establishment as beyond reproach. But after seven years of dealing with paleontologists and archaeologists, he said he has found them to be a devious and untrustworthy bunch whose actions in relation to him have been downright dishonest and deceitful."   

"Conrad believes his discovery has frightened members of the archeological/ paleontological establishment out of their wits. They dread the truth, he says, because they know their cozy little clique will be gone with the eons. No longer will they be able to sup at the trough of Darwinism, enjoying soft jobs with huge salaries." 

 

 

 

 

 

This is the very first specimen that Ed Conrad discovered in the Carboniferous-dated anthracite region of Pennsylvania but the Smithsonian's experts dismissed it as a concretion, a rock. However, petrified teeth were found inside the jaw-like area and an infrared scan revealed the material is "compatible with either tooth or bone in origin."

As time passed, Ed continued to search the same locality and kept finding numerous unusual objects that bore the contour of bone, although rock-like in their brownish coloration and weight. 

Approximately a year later and in the same general area _ only a short distance from where he had found the specimen resembling an anthropoid skull -- Ed discovered the large boulder in which was embedded the object that bore a distinct resemblance to a human cranium. 

Actually, Ed had passed the specimen hundreds of times but only after doing a bit of study about human skulls was he able to recognize it, since the jaw like area was facing downward. 

 

This is the boulder with the human skull protruding that Ed Conrad discovered in 1982, about a year after finding the specimen resembling the anthropoid skull. It was found in the same general area in precisely this position, with the jawbone facing downward. The Smithsonian had admitted that the protrusion does indeed resemble a human skull.

skullb 
This is another view of the human skull-like specimen protruding from the boulder. 

 

Wilton M. Krogman, the internationally acclaimed bone expert and author of "The Human Skeleton in Forensic Medicine," proudly holds one of Ed Conrad's specimens which he had identified as a human calvarium, a portion of a skull with the eyesockets broken off.

A CATscan had been done of this particular specimen and revealed intriguing characteristics of a human skull.

 

This giant skull, embedded in solid rock, presents several problems for materialists.

"And it may seem harmless to you now that its been exposed. But, did you know that over 500 people obtained their PhD's by writing their thesis on "the Piltdown Man"? I dare say, no one took back those PhDs after it was exposed, and those people taught hundreds of thousands of people." Wyatt, Newletter Five

In 1982 Dr. Lyall Watson stated: "The fossils that decorate our family tree are so scarce that there are still more scientists than specimens. The remarkable fact is that all of the physical evidence we have for human evolution can still be placed, with room to spare, inside a single coffin!"

Likewise, a 1994 article in Time Magazine admitted that: "Yet despite more than a century of digging, the fossil record remains maddeningly sparse. With so few clues, even a single bone that doesn't fit into the picture can upset everything. Virtually every major discovery has put deep cracks in the conventional wisdom and forced scientists to concoct new theories, amid furious debate."

Prior to more recent developments of techniques for dating by means of radioactive materials, there were fundamentally only two methods of estimating the age of a fossil. The first was the geological level at which the specimen was found.

The second, applying more particularly to human fossils, was the general appearance: whether apish and "primitive," or essentially like modern man. These two criteria are still largely applied, since the majority of the more ancient remains of early man are completely fossilized and C-14 methods of dating cannot be used.

But it has long been recognized that if the fossil remains of early man are arranged according to their degree of primitiveness, the order will be found to contradict the series arranged on the basis of antiquity as established by the levels at which they are found."

GIGANTOPITHECUS" & "MEGANTHROPUS"

There is no controversy about these facts; there was a race or group of people found in Australia called "meganthropus" by anthropologists. These people were of very large size--estimated between 7 to 12 feet tall, depending on what source you read.

These people were found with mega tool artifacts, so their humaness is difficult to question. Four jaw fragments and thousands of teeth have been found in China of "gigantopithecus blacki"--named after the discover. Based on the size of the teeth and deep jaws, its size has been estimated at around 10 feet and as tall as 12 feet, 1200 pounds. (Photo:Giant human femur reportedly found in Turkey)

The "problem" is that human fossils are the rarest of all, and generally, only the hardest bones, jaws, teeth and skulls survive. As with most "early man" artistic recreations, a great deal of the individual is surmised.

The question is, is gigantopithecus a man or an ape? I personally have no opinion, but it is clear that very large men did live once. Scientists are of course afraid of being ridiculed and rather than estimate the size of the individuals possessing larger skulls and teeth than "us", they prefer to use the term robust.

Anthropologists spend quite a bit of time trying to decide what is an ape, what is a man, who they believe descended from who and the like. Now, most consider gigantopithecus an ape,(its more convenient to the theory of evol) but the co-discover at least, and many others still see no difference between the teeth and jaws of Giganto than other so-called ancestors.

As we said, everyone believes that meganthropus with his mega-tools was a "man". Tools have been found in the same area as giganto as well, but the tendency has been to associate them with other "types' found at the same location.

MEGANTHROPUS

A comparison of the megatools from the six occupation sites soon showed considerable stylisation in the hand-axes, knives, adzes and other tools, forming two distinct tool-type culture periods. These have since been named the "Late" and "Early Phase", the "Early Phase" being the oldest and most primitive, the "Late Phase" showing more advanced styles of workmanship. ...the strata in which the "Early Phase" tools are found date from around 60,000 back to 180,000 years BP.

This is an example of a Mega Tool, over eighteen inches high. From an article by Scott Corrales.Another example of a mega tool is an ancient 37 lb copper axe (not pictured)

Aboriginal occupation of the Bathurst region itself dates back at least 50,000 years, so it is obvious that Aborigines lived side by side with the megatool people

In this Photo below: on the top left is one of the skulls biologists have labeled Australopithecines. On the right Meganthropus. Bottom left is a modern man in scale along with a chimpanzee skull.

Giant stone-age man stone artefacts (implements) have been found in Central Western NSW Southern & far Northern Qld. These implements consist of hand axes, clubs, pounders, adzes, knives & other tools often ranging in weight from 8 to 36 lbs or more.

These artifacts are in fact identical to those used by meganthropus the giant Java man who inhabited SE Asia over a "million years ago", Meganthropus stood 12 feet tall & weighed several hundred pounds..

Early in this century some unusually large human teeth and jawbones turned up, ones so large that their owner's size has been estimated at six to nine feet tall. Those found in Europe were named Meganthropus, those found in south China and Java became known as Gigantopithecus

If one believes the Biblical account, their presence is no mystery, since giants are mentioned as living before the Flood (Gen. 6:4).


There were giants on the earth in those days...

 

 
An Afghani Giant with a US soldier

 

>> Russia Goes On High Alert After UFO Shoot-Down Injures Hundreds

>> Glimmer of Hope: Washington Residents Force Seattle To Scrap Police Drones 

Report abuse

Comments

Your Comments
Question   Razz  Sad   Evil  Exclaim  Smile  Redface  Biggrin  Surprised  Eek   Confused   Cool  LOL   Mad   Twisted  Rolleyes   Wink  Idea  Arrow  Neutral  Cry   Mr. Green

Total 18 comments
  • Yep an that soldier was 6 foot 8 :lol: :lol:

    So watcha trying to say? that gigantism is proof of something? it is not proof of religion and certainly not proof of any deity. A rock that “resembles” a skull is not a skull.

    • baaaahh says the sheeple! :razz:

    • What does is prove stenpid? Well for one it proves that animal behaviorists have been able to actually teach chimpanzees how to work a computer keyboard. You are their proof of that and I wish you all the well when they unveil you at their symposium at Plum Island later this year. Maybe someday they will be able to to each your genetically engineered simian offspring to actually engage is some form of rudimentary logic. Just think of all the the new customers Wallmart will have.

  • Real human history is a million times more interesting than the lies told by mainstream history sources… Nat Geo and the History Channel are liars and frauds, nearly every story is paid for by an organization with an agenda.

    Too many people don’t give a damn though. They’re more worried about buying things or their sad little jobs…

    • True – go to any Natural History Museum and ask the top man to show you JUST ONE bone that indicates proof of evolutionary development of species into another animal – he will tell you no such evidence exists anywhere.

  • Darwin is so easy to debunk but by doing so the lie cannot continue and serious questions will have to be answered……sorry Darwin a continuous fossil record does not exist so your theory that so many ” believe” in like a religion is a fake , a phony , a lie ……..

    • ” 100 Million Years Old Giant Skull And Teeth Found Embedded In Coal ”
      …………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………….

      Boy, that giant musta been reeeeally hungry.

  • ive told you 100 Million times not to exaggerate… /smh

  • sten

    However, petrified teeth were found inside the jaw-like area and an infrared scan revealed the material is “compatible with either tooth or bone in origin.”
    A MRI scan would not lie. Infrared I never heard of in connection of penetrating Rock or fossilized Material.

  • 100 million?? you serious?? lmao if anyone believes that then they are in deep sleep

    • Not really they have proven people and dinosaurs lived together.They found human and dinosaur footprints side by side in Texas.They are real you’ll find lots of BS on google but it was on history channel fairly recently.They also found ancient carvings of dinosaurs all over the place and even a few in caves.I’m not saying this post is legit i’m just saying it’s not as insane as it sounds.Also the date of archaeological sites are always being pushed back and would happen faster in mainstream if scientists weren’t so arrogant.They also recently have shown radioactive decay rates are not constant witch basically throws carbon dating out the window

      • A human footprint alongside a dinosaur footprint proves only that a human was there, and so was a dinosaur; IN NO WAY does it prove they happened in the same era. You HAVE heard about a thing called “passage of time”, right?

    • Oh lookie here be have another troll. This one seems a little less advanced perhaps a prototypical model. Ever notice the really stupid ones go by the handle of anonymous?

  • I am the author of The Cross, The Rabbi, and the Skinwalker. There was nothing mythological about those posts. I researched them for nine months, only the best case scenarios were taken. Scott Wolter whom I relied upon for runic interpretations and forensic geologic evidence now has his own TV program with National Geographic. Your version of history ,of what is, and what was, is now like a desperate man clinging to a tree as the tidal wave of reality comes crashing down upon him. Göbekli Tepe in Turkey, the Yonaguni Monument off the Ryukyu Islands in Japan, Pumapunku in Bolivia, and Mehrgarh in Pakistan, all over the globe there is unimpeachable evidence that your way of looking at things is an anachronism for the Victorian Age.

    Your television set and “orthodox” reading material provide you with your world. You probably think Albert Einstein was a great scientist and Isaac Newton told you all you needed to know about physics. Unfortunately for you; Newton happened to have been a mystic and was practicing alchemy while he was devising ways for the crown of England to imprison your perception. You only know about Einstein because they do not want you to know about the Copenhagen School. Einstein didn’t invent the atomic bomb a defector from the Copenhagen School named Enrico Fermi did. Heisenberg could have but he refused too. Him and Bohr’s were into better things anyway like why Viktor Schauberger and the Vril Society were getting the results they were. Nazi science, occult science, jumped us ahead on the evolutionary scale a thousand years. You just don’t want to believe that you are being played like a puppet on a string by something that has access to the many worlds of Hugh Everett III. The world you dance your silly dance in is nasty, brutish, and short, just like Thomas Hobbs said.

    Three hundred years ago a philosopher and Christian shaman named George Berkeley first postulated the idea that matter, corporeal substance, the things man finds so familiar and comforting to behold and to touch, are only ideas in the mind of the beholder. Berkeley’s epiphany was called immaterialism now it’s called quantum physics. For two hundred years philosophers tried in vain to refute him. For the last one hundred years quantum physicists have been proving him correct. The ‘Slit Experiment’ proves that what man calls matter is intimately entwined with those that are observing it. ‘Bells Theorem’ proves matter has no location at its source, ‘Quantum Entanglement’ that everything is everything else. Time, and space itself, are constructs of the observer. Nothing can exist if there is nothing to see it. As Berkeley said “esse est percipi”, to be is to be perceived.

    The hair brained theory’s of Charles Darwin were proven wrong almost from the beginning but having you all think that you were ape-men made it so much the the more easier for you to accept that the only reason you were but on this earth were to perform your assigned role as animated mannequins and trade in you brief period of existence for the brightly colored beads that the elitists give you in exchange for a lifetime of servitude to them.

    Darwin never intended for the “Theory of evolution to include you” he wanted to wait and see what the fossil record had to say. The deceivers* simply took the ball and ran with it, so much easier to control you if you thought you were an animal. Michael Cremo and Richard L Thompson wrote a book: Forbidden Archeology that exposes the lies they have told you one by one in the empirical manner in which scientists are supposed to conduct themselves. The book is to evolutionists as a cross is to TV vampires they cannot refute it, they can only recoil from it in horror and pray to their monkey God that you never read or even hear of it.

    When evolutionary illuminist Ernest Haeckel author of ‘General Morphology of Organisms and a Natural History of Creation’ was brought before the court of Jena University on charges of fraud for creating his own evidence for one of his pet theory’s ; “Ontogeny”( embryonic development faithfully duplicates the evolution of its respective organism another words a human fetus must first look like a single celled organism then a fish with gills, a monkey and finally a human being). Haeckal defended his artwork ( Haeckel it seems was quite the scholar artist as he had also drawn a “Phylogenetic” tree showing Homosapiens on top and right below him Homostupidus) by saying : “ A small percentage of my embryonic drawings are forgeries those namely for which the observed material is so incomplete and insufficient as to compel us ( He meant of course he and his Darwinist colleagues) to fill and reconstruct the missing links by hypothesis and comparative synthesis I would feel utterly condemned were it not that hundreds of the best observers and biologists ( now he was snitching ) lie under the same charge”. Other fanatics of “Human Evolution” latter emulated Haeckal’s empirical example when they perpetrated the fraud of “Lucy”: even though Lucy’s actual remains did not include hands or feet; reconstructions are commonly presented with human or near-human hands and feet in spite of the fact that other skeletons of the same creature have hands and feet which are clearly those of an ape, with curved fingers for moving about in trees.The founders of the Theory of Evolution were prepared to go through any lengths in an effort to convince Homostupidus that they Homosapiens had solved the riddle of the origins of man: Three years before he published ‘Mans Place in Nature’ a few weeks before he presented his arguments in favor of apes having a Hippocampus Major, Thomas Huxley confidentially wrote ( I believe it was to his wife): “By next Friday evening they will all be convinced that they are monkeys”!

    Monkey boy Charles Darwin’s finch’s never “evolved” into anything but finch’s. The Cichlids in Lake Victoria in Tanzania also never became anything but Cichlids despite having been given millions of years to do so in both cases. Charles Otis Whitman’s pigeon experiments should have relegated all this ape-man nonsense to the same scrape heap of history that the flat earth occupies. But the British aristocracy will never allow that and the Grosvenor’s control all the earths institutions of higher “learning” (should read inculcation) starting with National Geographic and the Smithsonian.

    I am Jack Heart and I am hear to tell you that you must either wage a war of annihilation against your overlords of you can count on another 1500 years of dark ages. You can just Google my name I’m right at the top. You may want to start by reading about the true history of your country:

    http://open.salon.com/blog/jack_heart/2011/10/31/the_cross_the_rabbi_the_skin_walker_part_1

    http://open.salon.com/blog/jack_heart/2011/11/06/the_cross_the_rabbi_the_skin_walkerpart_2

    http://open.salon.com/blog/jack_heart/2011/11/08/the_cross_the_rabbi_the_skin_walker_part_3

  • The problem with human evolution is apes have 48 chromosomes. We do not.
    We have 46 chromosomes. Two of the chromosomes are double the size of the rest of the chromosomes. This makes for confusion.
    At some point in our history, mankind branched out. When did this 46 chromosome vs 48 chromosome thing occur? No one has a clear date on that. But somewhere around 225,000 B.C. is an educated guess.
    And interesting side issue is the migration of a Mongolian People to the North and South American Continent. The Japanese and the Chinese have an eye slant. They are from the Mongolian branch of the Human Family. The Negroid and Caucasian branches do not have this eye slant difference. The American Indian does not have the eye slant. So they must have migrated to this continent prior to this minor mutation. The Chinese have a history of at least 4,000 years. I am assuming it had to be at least 10,000 years ago that the American Indian migrated to this North American Continent.
    If we have “human” skulls embedded in coal, then this throws the 46 chromosome human back a long ways. No way to prove it.
    The problem I have is we are clearly older than a lot of people think. Where is the written histories of these peoples? India has documents they claim date back at least 20,000 years.
    The only thing that makes sense about it is that mankind has a history of disasters that have sent us back to primitive levels many times in our history.
    Most of the modern day technology came about in the last 500-600 years.
    If we are over 200,000 years old as a species then we could have had civilizations reach our level of technology and beyond quite a few times in prehistory. 500 years is not a long time.
    Even if the average person died between the ages of 40 and 50 it is only about 10-12 generations. Those are not exact numbers.
    I personally think that members of different branches of various species might have obtained enough technology and intelligence over the lifespan of the planet to produce space going technology.
    It is very possible that a reptile based species could have inhabited areas of our planet at one time. Don’t know what might have happened to them.
    We seem to be the only intelligent species left on the planet.
    So a species that is 8-14 feet high is not beyond the realm of possibility. That it is related in someway to us is also possible. The key here is whether or not it is before or after the 46 chromosome event. If it is that old, it is impossible to determine.
    What we need is a giant similar to this one, only frozen in the ice at one of the poles. If we are going to find such a creature, I think northern Greenland might hold it. Or Siberia had a strange event. Thousands of animals are quick frozen in the ice of Siberia. So a giant might be frozen in Siberia. Mammoths still had undigested food in their stomachs. That is how we know the event was some kind of super storm that took everyone by surprise.
    Such a giant might be one caught in that event. No where near the age of the one in the coal, though. But that is where I would look for a modern day version.

  • Jehovah’s Witnesses Infiltrated

    ================================================================
    [DOWNLOAD SHORT REPORTS (Jehovah's Witnesses UN NGO Fulfills Prophecy)]
    ================================================================

    Jehovahs-Witnesses-UN-NGO-Temple-Prophecy-Final-Fulfillment_short
    http://templelijah.webs.com/Jehovahs-Witnesses-UN-NGO-Temple-Prophecy-Final-Fulfillment_short.pdf

    Jehovahs-Witnesses-UN-NGO-Temple-Prophecy-Man-of-Lawlessness
    http://templelijah.webs.com/Jehovahs-Witnesses-UN-NGO-Temple-Prophecy-Man-of-Lawlessness.pdf

    Jehovahs-Witnesses-UN-NGO-Temple-Prophecy-Revelation-11-TwoWitnesses
    http://templelijah.webs.com/Jehovahs-Witnesses-UN-NGO-Temple-Prophecy-Revelation-11-TwoWitnesses.pdf

    Jehovahs-Witnesses-UN-NGO-Temple-Prophecy-Revelation-8-Replication
    http://templelijah.webs.com/Jehovahs-Witnesses-UN-NGO-Temple-Prophecy-Revelation-8-Replication.pdf

    Jehovahs-Witnesses-UN-NGO-Temple-Prophecy-Basic-Daniel-8-and-11
    http://templelijah.webs.com/Jehovahs-Witnesses-UN-NGO-Temple-Prophecy-Basic-Daniel-8-and-11.pdf

    Jehovahs-Witnesses-UN-NGO-Disgusting-Thing-Daniel11-proof
    http://templelijah.webs.com/Jehovahs-Witnesses-UN-NGO-Disgusting-Thing-Daniel11-proof.pdf

    Jehovahs-Witnesses-UN-NGO-Temple-Transgression-Daniel8-proof
    http://templelijah.webs.com/Jehovahs-Witnesses-UN-NGO-Temple-Transgression-Daniel8-Proof.pdf

Register

Newsletter

Email this story
Email this story
Share This Story:
Print this story
Email this story
Digg
Reddit
StumbleUpon
Share on Tumblr
GET ALERTS: